The result of the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum provoked considerable debate as to the factors that contributed to the vote in favour of withdrawal, with various theories and explanations being put forth. Following points provides an overview of the different claims being made.

1. Economy.

There were some advocates of Brexit UN agency saw effort the EU as associate economic chance for Great Britain. This was in contradiction to the stay campaign's warnings of economic injury as a result of Brexit and differed slightly from voters feeling economically left behind by EU membership.

Proponents of trade post-Brexit hope to strike trade deals with nations outside of the EU, aloof from EU laws, basic cognitive process this may boost Great Britain as a market, profit the economy and result in less government expenditure in value. To boot, the 2008 monetary crash and therefore the Eurozone crisis these days 2009 could have inspired others to need to maneuver the UK's economy any aloof from Europe's more and more integrated economy as a way of protective it.

2. Education.

Multiple sources have found a correlation between having a better level of education and ballot 'remain', additionally as a correlation between having lower instructional level and ballot 'leave'.

It’s projected that those with teaching and better activity skills square measure additional possible to price the economic advantages of economic process, the only Market and European membership, so would be additional inclined to vote 'remain'.

To boot, studies have shown that those with lower instructional qualifications square measure additional possible to be socially conservative and feel that European membership brings concerning constant and dramatic amendment to the United Kingdom, which might be associate incentive to vote 'leave'.

3. Britons felt less integrated with the EU.

In terms of integration, Great Britain had developed a name of being "an awkward partner" in Europe. Britain's reluctance to integrate itself with Europe was reaffirmed by the position it had been in following the conclusion of the Second warfare.

Its distinct sense of 'otherness' was strengthened by the actual fact that it had been one in all the sole European states to not be occupied throughout the war. Its empire, whereas exhausted, remained intact, and senior civil servants still regarded Great Britain as a serious international power.

4. Anti-establishment populism.

The idea of ballot in favor of Brexit was seen by several as some way to protest against the institution and therefore the elite UN agency were seen to own unnoticed "the can of the people" for too long.

The results of the vote was branded per se by Nigel Farage, UN agency claimed it to be a conclusion against "big bourgeois banks" and "big politics". Many citizens saw the vote itself as associate example of power being given back to the citizens to form choices and not the elites, with many citizens harboring discontent for these elites and therefore the power they hold.

For a few voters, ballot 'leave' defied the institution that was seen to be pro-Remain. The proponent nature of the vote was associate incentive for several to require the chance they felt they'd to own their voices detected over those of the elite and vote 'leave'.

5. The 'order versus openness' divide.

AAcademic Eric Kaufmann notes the comparatively sturdy correlational statistics between a voter's support for the capital punishment and their option to vote 'leave'. He says that this highlights a social division that he calls 'order versus openness'. He any argues that 'the order-openness divide is rising because the key political cleavage, overshadowing the left-right economic dimension'.

This conjointly links with instructional factors, people who square measure educated to a lower level, generally, feel left behind by economic process and ‘favor a ‘drawbridge up’ policy of less European integration, closed borders and fewer migrants, whereas the latter cluster square measure in favor of larger openness and international cooperation.

It is argued that information from the British Election Study suggests that support for the capital punishment is associate example of however valuing 'order' over 'openness' might have affected ballot behavior within the vote. people who valued 'order' were additional possible to support the capital punishment and vote 'leave' than people who were 'pro-remain' and against the capital punishment, that square measure stances thought of two price 'openness' additional.